Amazing CHEAT tool for free Credits & Pro Subscription in Pollo AI -- bonus codes for Pollo AI! No promo codes needed!

CLICK THIS LINK FOR FREE Credits & Pro Subscription in Pollo AI!

For free users, Pollo AI offers a very limited, entry-level experience—typically just a handful of credits, watermarked outputs, and access to a basic suite of templates and effects. Once the initial credits are depleted, users must either purchase standalone credit packs or upgrade to a subscription tier.

Uses of Credits
Pollo AI credits are a flexible, fungible currency within the app. They are expended on:

Text-to-Image generation: Usually the lowest credit consumption per output.

Text-to-Video and Image-to-Video transformations: These are more credit-intensive and deliver dynamic, high-quality video content.

Restyling, Effects, and Upscaling: Advanced edits or special video effects sometimes cost extra credits.

Access to Premium Models: Some models or long-form outputs may be exclusive to paid tiers or require a premium credit spend.

Given the diversity of models and content types, users must strategically allocate credits, particularly if using free or limited plans.

Subscription Tiers
Pollo AI’s core monetization options revolve around its subscription plans, most notably the Lite (sometimes referred to as Pro Lite) and Pro plans. There is also a “Pollo Weekly Premium” offered as an in-app purchase especially on mobile devices.

Free Plan
The Free Plan is largely a “trial” mode. It often includes:

Minimal credits for basic use (e.g., generating 1–4 videos and a handful of images with watermarks).

Single parallel task capability (i.e., only one generation job at a time).

Slower processing speeds, standard support.

Outputs are watermarked.

Access to the community for browsing and sharing.

This mode is primarily for exploration, with enough features to gauge the app’s capabilities but not sufficient for regular content creation.

Pro Subscription (Lite and Full Pro)


Lite Plan: About $10–$15/month and includes roughly 300 credits/month, up to 30 videos, and 300 images generated monthly. It allows for two parallel tasks and provides faster generation speeds, no-watermark outputs, private video visibility, more camera movement options, copy protection, and priority support. This tier is ideal for hobbyists and semi-regular creators wishing to upgrade from the limitations of the free plan.

Pro Plan: Ranging from $25 to $35/month (sometimes more for larger plans), it delivers 800 or more credits (allowing up to 80 videos or 800 images monthly), enables three or more parallel tasks, and includes comprehensive access to all advanced models, effects, and editing tools. Pro users can expect the fastest generation speeds, maximum template variety, elevated support, and more options for custom video editing and export. For power users, professionals, and heavy content creators, this tier offers the best value for large-scale generation or frequent creative output.

Prices for both Lite and Pro can scale upward, especially for users who need tens of thousands of credits per month, thanks to the flexible, slider-based pricing model. Annual plans come with significant discounts (often up to 15% off).

Pollo Weekly Premium
On mobile platforms, there is a Pollo Weekly Premium subscription priced at around $5.99 per week. This plan offers:

100 credits per week (sufficient for basic generation but limited for advanced or high-volume needs).

Watermark removal for generated images and videos.

Access to subscriber-only templates and models.

User reviews reveal a mixed experience with weekly premium, citing the inclusion of watermarked outputs even in paid plans at times, low credit allotments relative to feature cost, and an overall sentiment that better value exists in monthly or annual subscriptions. Some express dissatisfaction that a week’s credit supply is depleted quickly by just a handful of more ambitious videos or effects, especially as some single outputs cost over 100 credits.

In-App Purchases and Additional Credit Packs
Pollo AI supplements its subscriptions by selling one-off credit packs. Pricing examples include:

100 credits

300 credits

800 credits

2,000 credits

Such packs allow users to top up their credits as needed, ideal for handling periods of unusually high creativity or for specific projects demanding more resources without locking into a long-term subscription.



The community features are a major strength: creators can browse a feed of recent works, join ongoing discussions, remix templates, and draw inspiration from global peers. Private visibility options and copy protection tools are available for Pro and Lite subscribers who want tighter control over their intellectual property or wish to keep certain projects hidden.

User Feedback and Value for Money
User reviews on app stores and independent tech blogs reflect the duality inherent in Pollo AI’s monetization. The app is widely praised for:

Its breadth of models in one product, supporting everything from hyper-realistic styles to anime and claymation.

The quality and range of creative controls and visual effects.

The engaging, supportive community and encouragement of creative sharing.

However, criticisms center around:

High credit costs relative to amount received in subscriptions, particularly for video generation which consumes credits rapidly.

Occasional glitches, lag, or output errors, especially on mobile devices.

Mixed value perception for weekly premium, with many feeling monthly or annual plans offer more reasonable value for dedicated content creation.

The lack of a substantial free tier, with outputs in trial mode often watermarked and tightly restricted in scope and quality.


Experimenting with model stacking or sequential processing is another advanced approach. Create a base image or video in one model (for instance, running a quick sketch via DALL·E or Ideogram), then enhance or restyle it through another (feeding the result into Vidu or Pika for animation or stylistic transformation). This layered workflow leads to more unique and refined results compared to single-pass generation, especially for creators looking to differentiate their content in crowded social media spaces.